irs interest rates individuals 2020-2021

I like this research put out by J.P. Morgan with highlights the relationship between interest rates and the stock market under different conditions.This chart has four quadrants, two of which have basically no data points in them (upper-right and lower-left), and the remaining two are pretty saturated with a reasonable division between the two (as signified by the orange line).So what does this chart say? It shows the correlation between interest rates and the stock market. So, in the upper left quadrant, it shows a clear positive correlation between interest rates and the stock market (i.e. interest rates move up, the stock market moves up). And conversely, in the lower-right quadrant, the relationship has flipped to a negative correlation (i.e. interest rates move up, stock market moves down). {Please note, I do not mean to imply any causality here. I am not suggesting at the moment that rising interest rates in the upper-left quad. cause a rising stock market…just that there is a clear relationship.}What is the orange line (when does this relationship change) and where are we now?The orange line is the 10-year treasury yield at around 5%, so this chart suggests that when the 10-year treasury is below 5% and interest rates are rising, the stock market should also rise, and above 5%, when interest rates are rising, the stock market should decline. Currently, the 10-year treasury rate is at 2.26%, so well below the 5% dividing line.Why would that be (the two relationships)? One theory is that the causality that discussed before is somewhat flexible. When interest rates are high (think mortgages above 9%, increased loan rates on business, high credit card interest, etc.), if those rates increase, that becomes increasingly more burdensome on balance sheets everywhere, so spending decreases and so does economic activity thus reducing company earnings and the stock market. Under this scenario, the increase in interest becomes a “tax.” On the other hand, in lower interest rate environments (like now), if we were to increase our mortgage rate from 3.25% to 3.75%, we are still at very low rates, to the cost of financing is a relatively low cost. The same can be said for business loans, etc., but when interest rates are rising from a low environment, that is usually a signal that the over-all economic conditions are improving. This is a “tell” instead of a “tax.” The improving economic conditions more than offset the additional expense and so the market tends to move up.Where are we going?Of course that is the $64,000 question, but with the Janet Yellen, the Fed Chairman, having raised interest rates twice already this year and signalling more to come in this year and next, one might believe that the 10-year will also move up. However, this is not a certainly since the Fed Funds rate is a set short-term rate and the 10-year treasury is a market driven rate. Here is a chart of the 10-year treasury (which has been in a bit of a decline recently, although it is higher on the year):It is my belief that as the Fed raises the Fed funds rate (the over-night rate at which banks can borrow money), this will cause the velocity of money to actually increase in the market place (which is against finance 101 theory). The reason being that if the spread between the number at which banks can borrow and lend decreases, which is how they make their money (borrow low and lend out higher), they will no longer be able to lend to only pristine credit and make money (the spread will be too low and client base too small). On the margin, the banks will have to start lending out to slightly lower credit clients (we’re not talking sub-prime yet, just not immaculate credit) and charging a greater rate. The default rates should still be very low in an improving economy, and so the velocity of money increases (which could actually cause inflation and increased rates.)

Form 8379, the Injured Spouse declaration, is used to ensure that a spouse’s share of a refund from a joint tax return is not used by the IRS as an offset to pay a tax obligation of the other spouse.Before you file this, make sure that you know the difference between this and the Innocent Spouse declaration, Form 8857. You use Form 8379 when your spouse owes money for a legally enforeceable tax debt (such as a student loan which is in default) for which you are not jointly liable. You use Form 8857 when you want to be released from tax liability for an understatement of tax that resulted from actions taken by your spouse of which you had no knowledge, and had no reason to know.As the other answers have specified, you follow the Instructions for Form 8379 (11/2016) on the IRS Web site to actually fill it out.

Because the IRS doesn't know how much money you owe. They know approximately what you made, and they know a little bit about some of your deductions, but they don't know whether and to what extent you are entitled to additional deductions or credits, or whether and to what extent you earned money from transactions not reported to the IRS. Even on the transactions that were reported to the IRS, the IRS doesn't always know how much of that income is actually taxable - or at what rate.

That would depend on their personal situation, but should they actually have a full financial life in another country including investments, pensions, mortgages, insurance policies, a small business, multiple bank accounts…The reporting alone can be bankrupting, and that is before you get on to actual taxes that are punitive toward foreign finances owned by a US citizen and god help you if you make mistake because penalties appear designed to bankrupt you.US citizens globally are renouncing citizenship for good reason.This is extracted from a letter sent by the James Bopp law firm to Chairman Mark Meadows of the subcommittee of government operations regarding the difficulty faced by US citizens who try to live else where.“ FATCA is forcing Americans abroad into a set of circumstances where they must renounce their U.S. citizenship to survive.For example, suppose you have a married couple living in Washington DC. One works as a lobbyist for an NGO and has a defined benefits pensions. The other is self employed in a lobby firm, working under an LLC. According to the IRS filing requirements, it would take about 15 hours and $280 to complete their yearly filings. Should they under report income, any penalties would be a percentage of their unreported tax burden. The worst case is a 20% civil fraud penalty.Compare the same couple with one different fact. They moved to Australia because the NGO reassigned the wife to Sydney. The husband, likewise, moves his business overseas. They open a bank account, contribute to the mandatory Australian retirement fund, purchase a house with a mortgage and get a life insurance policy on both of them.These are now their new filing requirements:‡ Form 8938‡ Form 3520-A‡ Form 3520‡ Form 5471 (to be filed by the husbands new Australian corporation where he is self employed)‡ Form 720 Excise Tax.‡ FinCEN Form 114The burden that was 15 hours now goes up to‡ 57.2 hours for Form 720,‡ 54.20 hours for Form 3520,‡ 61.22 Hours for Form 3520-A.‡ 50 hours efor Form 5471For a total of 226.99 hours (according to the IRS’s own time estimates) not including time to file the FBAR.The penalties for innocent misfiling or non filings for the above foreign reporting forms for the couple are up to $50,000, per year. It is likely that the foreign income exclusion and foreign tax credit will negate any actual tax due to the IRS. So each year, there is a lurking $50,000 penalty for getting something technically wrong on a form, yet there would be no additional tax due to the US treasury.”

How did you learn about us?Rumors about rural houses having little Security.Location: 5/10Location was alright. Around 500 meters to the nearest neighbor. But unfortunately an hour away from any sizable population (20,000 plus being a sizable population.)Transportation: 10/10Transportation was top notch. The owners of the property never lock their Minivan or Pick-up truck. The keys are always left in the vehicles. Both are moderately new and somewhat non-descriptive so a perfect getaway vehicle. Not only did they prvehicles they also kept trailers in a easily accessible unlocked shed.Security: 9/10Security was lax. There is a gate but it isn’t locked. Doors aren’t locked unless the house is left unoccupied for more than 2 weeks. No cameras made it really easy. They did have a dog which made it a bit of a pain. He was easily disposed of as he was just a Labrador Retriever puppy. Owners are very light sleepers don’t rob if they’re around.Products: 10/10No place has better selection. The place had 3 DSLR cameras, 3 Workstation class desktops, 3 tablets, 4 drones, 6 Smartphones, 9 external monitors and 11 laptops. All of the items were of premium design and value (aka Apples or equivalent). The freezers and shelves were well stocked the rest of the property was much more appealing though.They also had a shop on the property with many tools ranging from mechanics to carpentry to fabrication. The tools were of medium quality. The shop also stored 2 ATV for added convenience. The shop wasn’t the jackpot though.The shed was the real treasure trove. This drive in shed held heavy equipment all with the keys in the ignition for easy accessibility. The average equipment’s value was around $100,000, with a combined value of around $1.5 Million. Unfortunately the heavy equipment is hard to transport and the market is too small to get away with it.The products all seemed gift wrapped for the taking. Everything was easy to find as it looked organized.Laws in the area: 10/10Owners aren’t allowed to use lethal force or even have a premeditated weapon for self defense. A robber in the area once accidentally locked himself into the garage place he was robbing. As the owners did not come home for a couple days he resorted to eating dog food. The end result was the owners were charged for negligence of the robber. Laws almost protect us. Owners are not supposed to attack us in any way or they may be charged.Would you recommend to your friends?If everybody is gone a resounding yes. Unfortunately that’s not very often as the house is occupied by Home-schooling kids, a Writer and the owner is a farmer who mostly works on property. Also if you intend to use brute force, bring a weapon. All the occupants are big. The average height is around 6 feet.BTW bring friends to help loot. It really requires a team of people to loot the place.

Thank you for the answer request.Inflation, over time, hurts lenders and benefits long-term borrowers. That’s because the purchasing power of the currency is steadily dropping, while the nominal value of the loan is constant.You can see it from another perspective, in the rise of real estate values over time. When my parents bought their home in 1965 they paid $30,000. The home today is assessed at approximately $400,000. All of that cannot possibly be the result of capital improvements in the house. It reflects instead the effects of inflation on the purchasing power of the USD during those 50 plus years.To illustrate, let’s say someone was making $14,000 in 1965. That was a pretty decent salary. In 1995, a comparable salary may have been $140,000. In other words, the same job paid ten times the salary, but only because it was adjusted over the years for inflation. So someone who took out a $30,000, thirty-year fixed mortgage was able to pay it down over time with inflated dollars. If his mortgage payments were $250/month in 1965 when he was grossing $1167, that would have been a little burdensome. In 1995, he would have been grossing $11,667/month. That $250 would have been pocket change.So why would the bank lend money out for 30 years knowing that inflation would cut into the value of the dollar? They don’t today, and that’s why the banks don’t keep their mortgages on their books anymore, but sell them to investment banks to securitize them as mortgage backed securities. The bank wants to keep lending that money short term, where it can constantly adjust its lending to account for inflation.

Sure, I can address tax issues here. You would use the W-8 Ben for an individual situation. And, you would use the W-8 Ben E for a company situation.Though, the actual completion of the form center on how the US international tax provision taxes the foreign person or company on the income. So, we first apply the tax law based on the fact situation at hand. So, the form completion centers on tax law and treaty law.Then, and if the person or company home country has a specific tax treaty with the US, we would then apply the exact treaty provision for mitigating (reducing) the withholding required.Here, we need to understand how treaties work and apply the most recent treaty or possibly and updated protocol or competent authority position between the US and the home country when we complete the treaty section of the W8-Ben or Ben-E. The above represents the procedure I have used when dealing with this situation. As with all events dealing with the US tax law completing this form correctly and fully provides for the best outcome allowed by tax law and treaty law.I have completed the above based on the fact situation. If the income type or facts change above, the tax results may change for sure. www.rst.tax